117007 stories
·
0 followers

Adam Lankford's Study of Mass Shootings Called into Question

1 Share

Alabama-(Ammoland.com)-The old saying goes, “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.”

When I research a topic for an article, I always keep a running list of my sources. Not only that but I also fact check my sources. That way if someone calls into question something I have written I can provide material evidence to where I have derived my data.

The ability to cite your sources become even more critical when you become a college professor. In an academic setting, any paper that is not peer-reviewed raises certain red flags. Non-verifiable information might be fine for a blog post, but not for a published academic article.

One of the most cited sources for information on mass shootings is Dr. Adam Lankford. Dr. Lankford is a criminology professor at the University of Alabama. Former President Obama and other left-leaning politicians have cited his research into gun violence to further their anti-gun agenda.

Being a published criminology professor Dr. Lankford sources on mass shootings must be impeccable, so AmmoLand decided to look into his claims made throughout his mass shooting study. It is customary for researches to list their sources, but it seems like Lankford has omitted any references for his data set in his published study.

AmmoLand reached out to Lankford through multiple mediums to see if he would provide us with a list of resources that he used in his research, but so far Lankford has refused to respond to our request. In fact, in the three years since his widely cited study became a Democratic talking point, he has declined all request for copies of his data set.

Real Clear Politics tried unsuccessfully to get the raw data that Lankford used in his study. Not only did Lankford refuse to give the political neutral website the data, but he also declined to describe the methods he used to gather the information. He also refused to give a reason for not divulging the data. It is customary for all academic studies to release their data so the results can be confirmed by third parties.

Earlier this month the left-leaning Washington Post also reached out to Lankford to discuss his findings. Lankford once again refused to discuss his results with the Post. The Washington Post was able to determine that Lankford discounted events like the terrorist attack in Mumbai as a mass shooting. Since Lankford has kept his method secret, we cannot learn what he considers a mass shooting. Lankford omitting of the Mumbai attacks in his study does not seem to be an oversight as reported by the Post.

Other News agency has reached out to Lankford for clarification on his research. The Washington Times and Fox News both had their request for the data shot down by Lankford. By not releasing the dataset or even what he considers a mass shooting Lankford makes the task of verifying his claims by using his methods impossible.

What is possible is to look at his claims and compare it to other research done on mass shootings in the US and globally. We still will not be able to determine his criteria for mass shootings used in his study, but we can make an educated guess to the validity of his claims.

Lankford claims that from 1966 to 2012 the US only made up 4.5% of the world’s population. That is where the verifiable data stops. He then goes on to claim that within the same period that the US accounted for 31% of all the mass public shooters.

Lankford goes as far as to claim that there have only been 202 mass public shooters during that time span outside the US. This claim is dubious at best and an outright lie at worst. Luckily for the AmmoLand reader, a lot of sourced research has been done into the topic of mass shootings in the US compared to mass shootings globally.

One of the leading organizations that have published studies into mass shooting is the Crime Prevention Research Center. The CPRC is led by famed American economist John Lott Jr. The CPRC cites all their data set information and sources.

Looking at their data, we can see a stark contrast between the research of Lankford and the research of the CPRC. Lankford research refers to shooters instead of shootings. If we consider that this isn't a typo within the last 15 years, there has been at least 3,081 shooters outside the US and 45 in the US. These estimates of shooters outside the US are towards the most conservative end of the spectrum. In reality, the numbers of worldwide mass shooters are most likely higher. All these examples given by the CPRC are verifiable and they cite their sources on their website.

If we assume that Lankford made a mistake when using the word shooter and was referring to shootings the numbers still are not close. There has been 1,448 mass public shooting outside the US and 43 within the US in the last 15 years.

It is worth noting that Lankford study goes back 47 years while the CPRC only goes back 15 years. If the CPRC expanded their research to 47 years, we can assume the numbers of mass shootings outside the US would go up. Tracing mass shootings back 47 years outside the US would be a very daunting task due to lack of news coverage of such attacks in the pre-24/7 news age.

AmmoLand ran a query of mass shootings outside the US using Google News to verify Lankford’s claims. While this method is unscientific, it did show the numbers of mass shootings that Lankford reported is massively on the low end of the spectrum. We could not figure out how Lankford arrived at his findings. After changing one variable at a time over the course of four hours we were still stumped and was forced to give up.

Once again, Lankford leaves us with the question, how did he get his data?

If Lankford wouldn't answer AmmoLand's questions, we thought we might be able to get answers from Dr. Lesley Reid. Dr. Reid chairs the Criminal Justice Department at the University of Alabama. UA is a public university, and if Lankford used public money for his research, then that research should be open to review even if Lankford did not submit his study to be peer-reviewed.

Unfortunately, Dr. Reid did not return AmmoLand's request. We asked Dr. Reid for the data set, all sources, and if it was common for UA professors to submit non-peer reviewed papers without citing sources.

We also asked Dr. Reid if there were any policies in place preventing the releasing of the data set. AmmoLand also inquired if Lankford used any public funds to pay for the study. Right now, we do not know where Lankford raised the money for the research.

With all the holes in Lankford's study, it is amazing that so many media sources cite his research. It could also be that his analysis falls in line with their predetermined outcome. To be sure, anti-gun politicians like Obama and anti-gun groups like Mom’s Demand Action use his numbers to push their anti-gun agenda.

Is Lankford making up his data to advance an anti-gun agenda, or is he pushing a false narrative to sell books? Readers should consider his data suspect until Lankford can explain the discrepancy between his findings and verifiable raw data that readers can source themselves with a simple Google source.

Until the data set is released, we will not be able to tell Lankford's motives in publishing a non-peer reviewed study and keeping his sources a secret.

The Crime Prevention Research Center makes all their data available on their website located at https://crimeresearch.org/


About John CrumpJohn Crump

John is a NRA instructor and a constitutional activist. He is the former CEO of Veritas Firearms, LLC and is the co-host of The Patriot News Podcast which can be found at www.blogtalkradio.com/patriotnews. John has written extensively on the patriot movement including 3%'ers, Oath Keepers, and Militias. In addition to the Patriot movement, John has written about firearms, interviewed people of all walks of life, and on the Constitution. John lives in Northern Virginia with his wife and sons and is currently working on a book on leftist deplatforming methods and can be followed on Twitter at @crumpyss, on Facebook at realjohncrump, or at www.crumpy.com.

Read the whole story
mikenova
1 hour ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

cia - Google Search

1 Share
Story image for cia from CNBC

CIA director says agency focused on nation state rivals

CNBC-5 hours ago
When foreign officials visit the CIA, they sometimes leave with a fine bottle of Kentucky bourbon, newly confirmed CIA Director Gina Haspel said ...
CIA Director Outlines Priorities for the Agency
U.S. News & World Report-5 hours ago
CIA director Gina Haspel speaks at UofL
Local Source-WAVE 3-9 hours ago
Read the whole story
mikenova
1 hour ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

gina haspel - Google Search

1 Share
Story image for gina haspel from New York Times

Gina Haspel Is Skeptical of North Korea's Willingness to Give Up ...

New York Times-7 hours ago
In rare public remarks, Gina Haspel, the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, said that North Korea has spent decades building its ...
Story image for gina haspel from Courier Journal

Louisville students protest CIA Director Gina Haspel's links to torture

Courier Journal-7 hours ago
CIA Director Gina Haspel didn't discuss her involvement with coercive interrogations of suspected terrorists during her speech Monday at the ...
CIA Director Gina Haspel pledges to target opioids entering the US
In-Depth-<a href="http://NBCNews.com" rel="nofollow">NBCNews.com</a>-9 hours ago
Read the whole story
mikenova
1 hour ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

CIA returning its central focus to nation-state rivals, director says

1 Share

LOUISVILLE — The Central Intelligence Agency is rededicating itself to the kinds of missions that defined the agency for most of its seven-decade existence, focusing on foreign nations that challenge or threaten the United States, its director said here on Monday.

In her first public remarks since being confirmed in May, Gina Haspel laid out her plan to return the agency to the work that was at the heart of its espionage mission before the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, which transformed the CIA into a paramilitary organization that conducted lethal operations against terrorists around the word.

Haspel’s remarks amounted to public affirmation of a transformation that has been underway for the past few years as the CIA attempts to shift from a consuming focus on terrorism.

Counterterrorism has not only absorbed much of the agency’s attention over the last 17 years but mired it in controversies over detention and interrogation. That history dogged Haspel during her confirmation process as senators and others focused on her role in the torture and brutal treatment of detainees.

The CIA’s spies and analysts will “invest more heavily in collection against the hardest issues,” Haspel said. She didn’t name specific countries, but the agency has set up new centers to collect intelligence against Iran and North Korea and has been training its assets on major powers like Russia and China, according to intelligence officials.

“Our efforts against these difficult intelligence gaps have been overshadowed over the years by the Intelligence Community’s justifiably heavy emphasis on counterterrorism in the wake of 9/11,” Haspel said. “Groups such as the so-called Islamic State and al-Qaida remain squarely in our sights, but we are sharpening our focus on nation-state rivals.”

Haspel, a native Kentuckian, spoke Monday at her alma mater, the University of Louisville, a friendly audience. She took no questions from the audience and did not speak to reporters.

Haspel shed little new light on what the state of negotiations with North Korea to suspend its development of nuclear weapons, a challenge in which she has played a leading role with Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who preceded her as head of the CIA.

But Haspel predicted that convincing North Korea to give up weapons would not be easy.

“The North Koreans view their capability as leverage and I don’t think that they want to give it up easily,” Haspel said in a question-and-answer session with Scott Jennings, a former adviser to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., who had introduced Haspel prior to her remarks.

Hapsel’s assessment on North Korea was slightly at odds with the sunnier picture painted by President Donald Trump, who has said that the success of negotiations depends largely on whether he and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un can personally arrive at some agreement.

Haspel didn’t contradict that idea, and said that the direct contact had done some good.

“We’re certainly in a better place than we were in 2017 because of the dialogue we’ve established between our two leaders,” she said.

Haspel remarked briefly on the challenges posed by other major American adversaries. She said the CIA is closely monitoring China’s efforts to expand its influence in developing nations in Latin America, Africa, and South Asia including by offering loans to poor countries that they cannot repay.

China seeks “to be the dominant force” in the Asia-Pacific region, Haspel said, and is “working to diminish U.S. influence.”

On Iran, Haspel said the regime and its proxies were the “most destabilizing” force in the region, an assessment aligned with CIA directors from prior administrations. Haspel’s predecessor set up a new mission center headed by an experienced counterterrorism officer to strengthen the CIA’s espionage operations against Iran.

Haspel praised the Iranian people and said that the regime was spending huge amounts of money propping up the regime in Syria or rebels in Yemen while Iran’s own economy crumbles.

“Their economy has been mismanaged,” Haspel said.

Haspel also turned her attention to U.S. domestic affairs and addressed the opioid epidemic and addiction, which she said the CIA would help combat by renewing counternarcotics efforts overseas to stem the flow of drugs into the United States.

“No foreign challenge has a more direct and devastating impact on American families and communities, including right here in Kentucky than the flow of opioids and other drugs into our country,” she said.

Drug addiction has “killed far more Americans than any terrorist group ever has,” Haspel said, and her home state has been hit especially hard by the epidemic. In 2016, Kentucky had 989 deaths related to opioid overdoses, placing it among the 10 states hardest hit by such deaths, according to the National Institute on Drug Abuse.

Haspel also said that recruiting and retaining officers with foreign language expertise would be among her priorities, particularly recruits who speak Arabic, Chinese, Farsi and Turkish. And she placed particular emphasis on the agency’s efforts to recruit a more diverse workforce.

“Our global mission demands that we recruit and retain the best and the brightest regardless of gender, race or cultural background,” Haspel said. Noting that when she joined the agency 35 years ago it was a “male-dominated” organization, Haspel said she had risen in the ranks because of “bosses who were willing to take a chance on me.”

“I managed to do well as an operations officer, and I did what I could to help bring down barriers that I had faced,” she said. “I’m also proud of a lot of other women who have risen through the ranks, especially since the 9/11 attacks.”

Read the whole story
mikenova
1 hour ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

manafort - Google Search

1 Share
Story image for manafort from iDrop News

How Apple's iCloud Lead to the Conviction of Paul Manafort

iDrop News-21 minutes ago
Manafort, in August, was convicted by a grand jury on eight counts of bank and ... about how Manafort's misuse of Apple products, as well as “poor operational ...
Story image for manafort from LubbockOnline.com

It's Debatable: Should the president pardon his former campaign ...

<a href="http://LubbockOnline.com" rel="nofollow">LubbockOnline.com</a>-1 hour ago
This week, Arnold Loewy and Charles Moster debate whether Donald Trump should pardon his former campaign adviser Paul Manafort. Moster is a former ...
Story image for manafort from AlterNet

This One Piece of Paper Threatens Trump at His Very Core — And ...

AlterNet-4 hours ago
Cohen, Manafort, and Weisselberg's testimony threatens Trump at his very core. It threatens to reveal the layers of Russia-connected money laundering, tax ...
Story image for manafort from Enterprise News

Pilipenko: What Manafort's cooperation may reveal

Enterprise News-9 hours ago
President Donald Trump's defenders responded to the news of Paul Manafort's plea deal two Fridays ago with the usual refrain: His case has nothing to do with ...
Read the whole story
mikenova
2 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete

10:26 AM 9/23/2018 - German Intelligence Update - Google Search

1 Share
10:26 AM 9/23/2018 - German Intelligence Update - Google Search
Read the whole story
mikenova
2 hours ago
reply
Share this story
Delete
Next Page of Stories